ISO 14005 - Guidelines for the phased implementation of an environmental management system, including the use of environmental performance evaluation
ISO 14005 was first published in 2010. Following detailed consultation with National Standard Bodies (NSB) it has been decided to revise the standard starting late 2016 and taking 2 years - fast track process. Chair and secretariat are provided by Germany (DIN).
The overall aim for the revised standard
Encourage and guide implementation of an EMS according to ISO 14001:2015
Increase uptake of ISO 14001 among SMEs and along the supply chain, using a phased approach
The intent of the revised standard
Due to growing pressures on the environment, interested parties increasingly expect organizations to manage their interactions with the environment responsibly and proactively. By committing to a systematic approach for environmental management, the organization can respond to these needs and expectations achieve continual improvement of environmental performance and gain a number of other advantages.
Many organizations already benefit from having an environmental management system (EMS). However many more organizations, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), still lack a formal EMS and therefore do not reap all of the benefits. The full implementation of an EMS at once might prove difficult for some organizations and often depends on availability of resources. Using a phased approach allows an organization to develop its EMS over time and to its specific circumstances.
Two applications will be in focus
- Starting from fragmented activities related to the improvement of environmental performance, develop the insight that a more structured and systematic approach regarding EMS is useful
- Assessing an existing EMS with regard to gaps vs. ISO 14001:2015, in business (suppliers due diligence, outsourced processes) or policy (against other CSR or EMS approaches) context
The scope of the revised standard
The target audience for the revised standard
- Organizations, especially small and medium sized, who do not yet have an EMS according to ISO 14001, and want to build it over time
- Organizations who intend to move from ad-hoc solutions to a systematic approach for improving their environmental footprint, thus saving cost and increase efficiency –starting with the most promising areas
- Organizations who intend to fulfill increased requirements in respect of their supply chain and subcontractors
- Politicians who intend to grant regulatory relief to organizations with a suitable EMS
Timeline (as of July, 2017)
- 30 and 31 August 2016: Workshop on content and approaches to specific issues
- 9 to 11 November 2016: 1st WG meeting in Berlin, develop WD.1 and issue for comment in WG 9
- 22 to 24 March 2017: 2nd WG meeting in London, develop WD.2 and issue for comment in WG 9
- 7 to 9 June 2017: 3rd WG meeting in Halifax, develop CD.1 and issue for comment and ballot in SC 1
- 18 to 22 September 2017: 4th WG meeting in Oslo to resolve collated comments on CD.1 and to develop DIS
- November – December 2017: 8 weeks translation of DIS
- January – March 2018: DIS – 12 week ballot in SC 1
- June 2018: 5th WG Meeting for DIS comments’ resolution
- July 2018: SC1 Ballot aiming to skip FDIS
- September 2018: Publication of ISO 14005
Frequently Asked Questions - FAQ
A phased approach offers several advantages. Organizations can readily evaluate how the time and money put into an EMS provides a return. They can develop an EMS that meets their requirements allowing them to start and stop to suit their resources - both human and financial - and see how environmental improvements can help to reduce costs, to improve community relations, to assist in demonstrating legal compliance, as well as to help living up to expectations of interested parties.